• MySTV

Scrapping not proven verdict 'could shift jurors to guilty'

A study has found jurors were less likely to favour a guilty verdict when not proven was available.

Study: Not proven verdict.
Study: Not proven verdict.

Scrapping Scotland's unique not proven verdict could shift more jurors to a guilty decision in finely-balanced trials, a study has found.

At the moment, juries are asked to decide if someone is guilty or not guilty, or if the charges against them are not proven - with this controversial verdict resulting in the accused person being acquitted.

However, new research into the behaviour of juries in Scotland - which have 15 members instead of 12 - concluded that individual jurors were significantly less likely to favour a guilty verdict when the not proven verdict was available.

The study also found when a not proven verdict was available, juries tended to opt for this instead of not guilty to acquit an accused.

Researchers said it showed inconsistent views on the meaning of not proven and how it differed from not guilty.

The study was carried on behalf of the Scottish Government by Ipsos MORI Scotland and researchers from the Universities of Glasgow and Warwick.

More than 860 Scots took part in 64 mock jury trials, featuring fictional but realistic rape or assault cases.

Of the 32 cases where a not proven verdict was available, 26 resulted in an acquittal - with 24 of these being with a not proven verdict.

Justice secretary Humza Yousaf.
Justice secretary Humza Yousaf. STV

The report said: "This suggests that, in finely balanced trials, juries have a preference for acquitting via not proven rather than not guilty."

It went on to state that removing the not proven verdict "might lead to more jurors favouring a guilty verdict, which might, therefore, lead to more guilty verdicts over a larger number of trials".

However the report stressed "it was not possible to estimate the likely scale of any such impact".

Justice secretary Humza Yousaf said: "I am grateful to everyone who gave up their time for this major piece of research, which is just one part of our work to improve Scotland's justice system for all.

"We will now engage with legal professionals and the wider public to consider all of the findings. We are organising events around the country and I am keen to hear from a wide range of people, especially those with personal experience of the criminal justice system.

"In particular, we will now engage in serious discussions on all of these findings including whether we should move to a two verdicts system. My mind is open and we will not pre-judge the outcome of those conversations."

Rachel Ormston, research director at Ipsos MORI, said: "It was a privilege to be involved in the most extensive programme of mock jury research carried out in the UK.

https://stv.tv/news/politics/1437944-ponsonby-scotland-s-not-proven-verdict-back-in-the-dock/ | default

"The report presents detailed findings on how the unique features of the Scottish system impact on juror decision-making and as such will allow decisions about any potential future changes to be taken on the basis of robust evidence."

Fiona Leverick, professor of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice at the University of Glasgow, said: "In shining a light on the ways in which jurors understand and use the not proven verdict, this study will help inform ongoing debates about this verdict. It also provides insight into areas where jurors may require additional support or guidance to avoid legal misunderstandings."

'Removing not proven verdict will give closure'

A Dundee woman who reported being raped believes the justice system is "not fit for purpose" and is not equipped to deal with serious sexual assault cases.

Cara MacKay, whose alleged attacker was found not proven following a trial in 2015, believes removing the  verdict will give both the alleged victim and accused closure.

She told STV News: "The not proven verdict was the outcome of the case against my attacker and I do see it as an issue.

"Closure - it's as simple as that. So there's an end, there's a decision been made - and with a non-proven or not proven verdict, it still leaves it open - so there's a 'what if?'.

"And I think that in itself doesn't give the survivors of these types of crime any form of justice.

"I can't imagine that it's any luxury to be given a non-proven verdict for the attacker."

When Ms MacKay reported her alleged attack, she was unaware that there was an alternative verdict which would allow the jury to "essentially not make a decision".

She said: "It's not something that I'm criticising for the people in the room that have that responsibility - because that's given to them, that's an option.

"So I see the jury themselves not at fault, but the system is entirely at fault.

"I feel that if we are to partake in this justice system, then there needs to be a change.

"It's not built for trauma cases and it doesn't have any standing in terms of closure for afterwards for anyone involved."

She stated that she was shown "no empathy" during the legal proceedings, adding: "All we are is evidence."

Download: The STV News app is Scotland's favourite and is available for iPhone from the App store and for Android from Google Play. Download it today and continue to enjoy STV News wherever you are.

One account. All of STV.

This field is required. That doesn't look like a valid e-mail format, please check. That e-mail's already in our system. Please try again.
Forgot password?
This field is required. This must be at least 6 characters long. Did you enter your details correctly?
If you've forgotten your details then use the 'Forgot password?' link.
Need to reset your password?

We'll send a link to reset your password to

We've sent you details on how to reset your password

Please check your email and follow the instructions.

Forgotten your email address?

Have you forgotten the email address that you previously joined with? Don't worry, by emailing enquiries@stv.tv we can help.

One account. All of STV.

This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This must be at least 6 characters long.
This field is required. This must be at least 6 characters long.
You must be over 16 to join STV.
This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid date
We need this to check that you live in an STV region.
This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid postcode
Would you like us to email you about our great shows and services from time to time?
We'll only send emails we think you'll like (see example) based on information you have supplied and shows you have watched on STV Player. For details on emails and advertising, see our STV & You page.
Would you like to receive emails from the Scottish Children's Lottery about draws, instant games and competitions?
We support the Scottish Children's Lottery (SCL), which is managed by our colleagues at STV ELM Ltd. You can find out more about the SCL on its website, including its Privacy Policy.

By continuing you agree to our Terms of Use, and understand our Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Upload Profile Picture

Please make sure your image is under 2mb in size and a valid JPG, PNG or GIF.

Are you sure?

Unfortunately, you'll be unable to access our premium content. We’ll be sorry to see you go, but if you change your mind you can rejoin us at any time.

Please verify your STV account

Please verify your STV account using the email we sent you. If you have lost the email, we can send you another one, just click the button below.


We've sent you a new verification email.
Please check your email and follow the instructions to verify your account.

Welcome to STV
Thanks for joining us.


Sorry, you must be at least 12 years old to place a vote for your Real Hero.

Please review our Voting Terms of Use for more information.


Sorry! It seems that you are using a browser that is incompatible with our voting service.

To register your vote please copy the below URL in to your regular mobile browser. We recommend Google Chrome, or Safari.



Sorry, you seem to have already voted in this category.

Thanks for voting

Now share your vote with friends on your social network

Share on twitter Share on facebook

Cast your vote

Please register or sign in to continue.

Cast your vote

This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid date

Cast your vote

Please fill out this form to cast your vote. As you are under 16 years old you will not create an STV account. Why do we need these details?

This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. That doesn't look like a valid e-mail format, please check.
Location This field is required.
Parental Consent This field is required.

That's you. All that's left is to click the 'Submit Vote' button below. By doing so, you confirm that you and your parent or guardian have read and accept our Voting Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Cookie policy, and that the details you have entered are correct. We'll look after them as carefully as if they were our own.