• MySTV

World's End murder accused opposes double jeopardy re-trial bid

Angus Sinclair's lawyers questioned whether the re-trial evidence was new at all.

Angus Sinclair: The trial against Mr Sinclair collapsed in 2007 and he was cleared of the murders.

A man acquitted of the World's End murders plans to oppose a move by prosecutors to seek to put him on trial again for a second time in a unique legal move in Scotland.

Angus Sinclair was not present because of a medical condition when his case called before three High Court judges in Edinburgh on Tuesday for a procedural hearing.

His defence counsel Ian Duguid QC said they wanted to look into whether what was being put forward "constitutes new evidence at all".

Sinclair was acquitted of the murders of teenagers Christine Eadie and Helen Scott at a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2007, where he denied the alleged crimes, when the trial judge, Lord Clarke, ruled there was insufficient evidence for the case to go to the jury.

The Crown has now made an application to bring fresh proceedings against him following an alteration in the law over "double jeopardy" which prohibited a second trial after an acquittal.

Scotland's senior law officer, the Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland QC, told the Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Carloway, sitting with Lord Menzies and Lady Smith that the Crown was ready to proceed to a full hearing on the issue.

Mr Mulholland said: "There are tests, hurdles, which require to be overcome." He said that involved the court considering whether the case was substantially strengthened by new evidence and whether a reasonable jury would convict on the basis of the new evidence along with previous material.

The Lord Advocate said it was 35 years and the families were anxious to have finality in the matter. Sinclair was charged with raping and murdering Miss Eadie and Miss Scott, both 17, who had gone to the World's End pub in Edinburgh's Royal Mile before their bodies were found in East Lothian in October 1977 at his earlier trial.

Mr Mulholland said he estimated eight days would be sufficient for a hearing on the Crown application which was originally scheduled for April. Mr Duguid responded: "As far as this application is concerned I can indicate, having taken the instructions of the respondent, that the application is opposed."

He told the court that in preparation for that the defence would have to assess whether it was new evidence being put forward and possibly challenge it.

"It would be a matter of investigation as to whether this does constitute new evidence," he said. Mr Duguid added that a forensic scientist instructed at the previous trial was now a member of the body instructed by the Crown. The defence counsel said it would be necessary to contact a different forensic scientist and indicated inquiries were at "a comparatively early stage".

He told the judges that he considered it was "almost inevitable" that the court would have to hear evidence.

Lord Carloway said they would appoint Sinclair to lodge answers to the Crown application setting out the scope of his challenge to it by April 30 and have a further procedural hearing set down for half a day on May 14.

One account. All of STV.

This field is required. That doesn't look like a valid e-mail format, please check. That e-mail's already in our system. Please try again.
Forgot password?
This field is required. At least 6 characters please. Did you enter your details correctly?
If you've forgotten your details then use the 'Forgot password?' link.
Need to reset your password?

We'll send a link to reset your password to

We've sent you details on how to reset your password

Please check your email and follow the instructions.

Forgotten your email address?

Have you forgotten the email address that you previously joined with? Don't worry, by emailing enquiries@stv.tv we can help.

One account. All of STV.

This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
At least 6 characters please
This field is required. At least 6 characters please.
You have to be 16 or over to join
This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid date
Type your full postcode and select your address This field is required. It doesn't look like you've entered a valid postcode. Can't find your address? Confirm the details you've given us are correct by clicking here

By continuing you agree to our Terms of Use, including our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. Any issues contact us.

Upload Profile Picture

Please make sure your image is under 2mb in size and a valid JPG, PNG or GIF.

Are you sure?

Unfortunately, you'll be unable to access our premium content. We’ll be sorry to see you go, but if you change your mind you can rejoin us at any time.

Please verify your STV account

Please verify your STV account using the email we sent you. If you have lost the email, we can send you another one, just click the button below.


We've sent you a new verification email.
Please check your email and follow the instructions to verify your account.

Welcome to STV
Thanks for joining us.


Sorry, you must be at least 12 years old to place a vote for your Real Hero.

Please review our Voting Terms of Use for more information.


Sorry! It seems that you are using a browser that is incompatible with our voting service.

To register your vote please copy the below URL in to your regular mobile browser. We recommend Google Chrome, or Safari.



Sorry, you seem to have already voted in this category.

Thanks for voting

Now share your vote with friends on your social network

Share on twitter Share on facebook

Cast your vote

Please register or sign in to continue.

Cast your vote

This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid date

Cast your vote

Please fill out this form to cast your vote. As you are under 16 years old you will not create an STV account. Why do we need these details?

This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. That doesn't look like a valid e-mail format, please check.
Location This field is required.
Parental Consent This field is required.

That's you. All that's left is to click the 'Submit Vote' button below. By doing so, you confirm that you and your parent or guardian have read and accept our Voting Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Cookie policy, and that the details you have entered are correct. We'll look after them as carefully as if they were our own.