How a 48-team Champions League group stage could work

If Celtic get their way, the European football landscape could look like this.

Glamour: The Champions League is the most high-profile stage in club football.
Glamour: The Champions League is the most high-profile stage in club football. SNS Group

Since rebranding the European Cup to become the Champions League, the size and value of Europe's premier club competition has grown rapidly.

With that growth there has been significant change, and calls for further evolution, with the clubs at the top of the game becoming distanced from the rest.

What benefits the few isn't always good for the rest and concerns from clubs worried they'll suffer in the long term have become louder in recent years.

Now Celtic and a group of similar-minded clubs from across the continent have taken steps to push for a change that could be significant for European football.

STV has has taken a look at what could happen if UEFA and its clubs are persuaded a major overhaul is needed.

What have Celtic done?

The club, along with representatives of other clubs from smaller nations, met with UEFA this month to suggest and lobby for an expansion of the Champions League. They want the group stage to be expanded to 48 teams from the current 32.

As Scottish champions for the last five seasons, Celtic have reached the group stage of the Champions League on three occasions but want a route for clubs on a regular basis. That feeling is shared by clubs across the continent, particularly in the Netherlands, Portugal and in Scandinavia.

https://stv.tv/sport/football/1380884-celtic-lobby-uefa-for-48-team-champions-league-group-stage/ | default

Why have these clubs acted now?

There is a very real fear from some clubs across Europe that changes already introduced are the next step on the road to a 'closed shop' Champions League that is just for the richest of the rich.

Without access to Champions League money, the gap between rich and poor would widen and there have been warnings that domestic leagues would suffer a knock-on effect.

"The threat is very real, very significant," SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster said last year.

"It is important to be a domestic champion club, that is the same across Europe, it is about access to the top-tier of European competitive football with the other champions of European football.

"Remove that and you fundamentally remove what is important about being a champion in a domestic contest. You would damage irreversibly the mid-level domestic leagues."

What changes are already coming?

As part of a major shake-up of the competition, Scotland's champions will face four qualifying rounds before making the group stage for the three seasons from 2018/19.

This is part of the move to accommodate the top four teams from the four biggest leagues - England, Spain, Germany and Italy - in the group stage for the next competition cycle. That's half of the available places in the group stage taken up from just four leagues.

Who would a 48-team competition benefit?

The aim is to find a model that benefits everyone. Preserving a place in the Champions League for the winners of championships outside the bigger nations is the prime objective.

However, it stands little chance of success if it can't also deliver positives for the bigger clubs and for UEFA itself. That means revenue increases for both.

What are the downsides?

Manchester City v Juventus
PA

There are already some who see the group stage of the competition as suffering from a lack of competition and the same few big sides make it through every year. Each season sees at least one hammering being handed out from a Goliath to a David and the inclusion of smaller teams being questioned.

That leads to concerns about viewing figures for the competition ongoing, at least in the early stages and whether broadcast revenues and sponsorship will continue to rise.

When this debate takes place, it is never about the attractiveness of Manchester City v Juventus but always a team from outwith the big four whose right to play at elite level is called into doubt. Real Madrid's disdain for a match against BATE Borisov in 2008 is a prime example.

A new proposal to reshape the tournament to the advantage of the middle tier has to address those concerns head on.

We don't know what detail Celtic and their colleagues put to UEFA but there are many ways to reformat the competition for more teams. We've looked at two of the more obvious possibilities.

Scenario one: 16 groups of three

Any call for a 48-team Champions League instantly brings to mind the changes recently announced to the World Cup, which will increase to the same number of teams from 2026.

That model seems like an obvious template to look at but it also has obvious flaws.

The World Cup is to begin with 16 groups of three and looking at that from the perspective of European football, it seems very neat.

Sixteen groups could mean a top seed place for the top four sides from the top four leagues, instantly offering the biggest clubs stature and protection. The remaining 32 sides could be split by their club coefficient into two seeding groups.

The number of group stage games would be same as it is currently, with 96 games played between September and December.

The format could also allow some flexibility for the knockout rounds. Allowing the top team from each group through would mean a round of 16, as the competition currently has.

Alternatively, two could go through per group with an additional last 32 knockout round added.

The major problem here is that a group of three means one team sitting out per matchday. That creates a difficult calendar and poses a real problem with the final group of games when two sides may be able to play out a draw to knock out the third.

If that could be overcome there are both pros and cons for the bigger sides. Automatic seeding and avoiding another 'Big Four' side increases chances of progression. However, with less teams and games in the group, one slip could be more costly than it is at the moment, where there are another five games to prove superiority.

Scenario two: 12 groups of four

Far simpler would be to take the existing Champions League model and add four more groups of four.

This would increase the number of games significantly. There would be 144 games in the group stage, which might risk saturating the market, though individual teams wouldn't face any more matches than they do at the moment.

That increase in games could help drive up revenues for UEFA and result in a bigger pot to split between clubs.

The champions of the top 12 leagues could all be made top seeds and kept apart with others being seeded according to club coefficient.

There would also be flexibility over whether to add an extra knock-out round.

To create a round of 16, the group winners plus the four best second-placed teams would qualify. If a round of 32 is preferred then the top two sides in each group, plus the eight best third-placed teams would progress.

What would it mean for the Europa League?

One consolation in the current set-up is that middle-tier teams can at least rely on the Europa League as a secondary competition. Either because they fail to make the Champions League groups or finish third and drop into the Europa after Christmas, it provides additional competition and revenue.

A Europa League that 'loses' another 16 teams to its big brother might struggle for profile and the impact on the secondary competition would probably be a factor in any changes.

One account. All of STV.

This field is required. That doesn't look like a valid e-mail format, please check. That e-mail's already in our system. Please try again.
ShowHide
Forgot password?
This field is required. At least 6 characters please. Did you enter your details correctly?
If you've forgotten your details then use the 'Forgot password?' link.
Need to reset your password?

We'll send a link to reset your password to

We've sent you details on how to reset your password

Please check your email and follow the instructions.

Forgotten your email address?

Have you forgotten the email address that you previously joined with? Don't worry, by emailing enquiries@stv.tv we can help.

One account. All of STV.

This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
At least 6 characters please
ShowHide
This field is required. At least 6 characters please.
You have to be 16 or over to join
This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid date
Type your full postcode and select your address This field is required. It doesn't look like you've entered a valid postcode. Can't find your address? Confirm the details you've given us are correct by clicking here

By continuing you agree to our Terms of Use, including our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. Any issues contact us.

Upload Profile Picture

Please make sure your image is under 2mb in size and a valid JPG, PNG or GIF.

Are you sure?

Unfortunately, you'll be unable to access our premium content. We’ll be sorry to see you go, but if you change your mind you can rejoin us at any time.

Please verify your STV account

Please verify your STV account using the email we sent you. If you have lost the email, we can send you another one, just click the button below.

Thanks

We've sent you a new verification email.
Please check your email and follow the instructions to verify your account.

Welcome to STV
Thanks for joining us.

Oops!

Sorry, you must be at least 12 years old to place a vote for your Real Hero.

Please review our Voting Terms of Use for more information.

Oops!

Sorry! It seems that you are using a browser that is incompatible with our voting service.

To register your vote please copy the below URL in to your regular mobile browser. We recommend Google Chrome, or Safari.

http://shows.stv.tv/real-heroes/voting

Oops!

Sorry, you seem to have already voted in this category.

Thanks for voting

Now share your vote with friends on your social network

Share on twitter Share on facebook

Cast your vote

Please register or sign in to continue.

Cast your vote

This field is required. This doesn't appear to be a valid date

Cast your vote

Please fill out this form to cast your vote. As you are under 16 years old you will not create an STV account. Why do we need these details?

This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. Please enter at least 2 characters
This field is required. That doesn't look like a valid e-mail format, please check.
Location This field is required.
Parental Consent This field is required.

That's you. All that's left is to click the 'Submit Vote' button below. By doing so, you confirm that you and your parent or guardian have read and accept our Voting Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Cookie policy, and that the details you have entered are correct. We'll look after them as carefully as if they were our own.